|
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
[1.
Introduction] [2.
Numerical simulation...] [3.
Multiple quasigeostrophic...] [4.
Deep subgeostrophy...] [5.
Implications of...] [6.
Overall summary...] [References]
[Figures]
[Tables]
Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina
ABSTRACT
Meso-beta-scale numerical model simulations and observational data are synthesized in an effort to develop a multistage paradigm for use in forecasting tornadic convection in the southeastern United States. The case study to be utilized as an example of the multistage sequence of events is the Palm Sunday 1994 outbreak, which culminates with the development of an unbalanced mesoscale jet streak or jetlet that focuses a given region for significant values of low-level vertical wind shear, low-level confluence and vertical vorticity, midtropospheric cooling, and storm-relative helicity. The five-stage paradigm includes 1) the existence of a jet exit region accompanying a deep balanced thermally indirect circulation south of the outbreak and a return branch ageostrophic low-level southerly jet, both typically accompanying the subtropical jet stream and the leading edge of hot continental air; 2) the existence of a jet entrance region accompanying a deep balanced thermally direct circulation north of the outbreak and a return branch ageostrophic low-level northerly jet, both typically accompanying the polar jet stream and the leading edge of rain-cooled air; 3) the geostrophic adjustment of the wind in the southern jet to the emerging/intensifying mass field perturbation, that is, intensification of the cross-stream mesoscale pressure gradient force, caused by the juxtaposition of the rain-cooled air southeast of the polar front and hot air accompanying the continental front where evaporational cooling as well as surface heating merge resulting in unbalanced jetlet formation; 4) the low-level mass adjustment underneath the new mesoscale midtropospheric unbalanced jetlet induces a return branch low-level unbalanced jetlet as well as vertical motion patterns oriented along the stream; and 5) adiabatic cooling ahead of the unbalanced jetlet and sinking behind it accompanying the along-stream vertical circulation increases the intensity of downstream destabilization and upstream downward momentum fluxes, producing a favorable environment for severe convection.
This new synoptic/dynamical overview assigns added importance to the subtropical jet, defines the continental air front, and also defines the unbalanced jetlet for use in predicting the presevere storm environment.
1. Introduction Return
to TOC 2. Numerical simulation experiment Return
to TOC 3. Multiple quasigeostrophic jet streak secondary circulations Return
to TOC a. Observations b. Simulations c. Summary 4. Deep subgeostrophy and unbalanced jetlet formation southeast of the
surface cold front Return
to TOC a. Observations b. Simulations
Jet streams have played a central role in the development of
forecasting algorithms for severe weather. Among the pioneering studies of
severe weather prediction were those by Fawbush
et al. (1951) , Browning
and Donaldson (1963) , Newton
(1963) , and House
(1963) . In these studies the vertical shear between a mid–upper
tropospheric jet stream and a low-level jet stream were considered as key
ingredients resulting in a specific region observing severe convection. The
processes leading to severe convection as diagnosed from synoptic-scale
datasets, including the development of low static stability and the tilting of
horizontal vorticity into the vertical, were deemed to maximize within the
region where the vertical wind shear was significant between the lower and
middle troposphere. A plethora of forecast indices have been developed over the
last 40 years wherein the vertical wind shear was included as a measure of the
potential for the synoptic-scale atmosphere to support violent convection.
A more complete understanding of the dynamical relationship between the
upper- and lower-level jet streams, that is, the vertical coupling of upper- and
lower-tropospheric jet streams and their implication for violent convection, was
derived from the synoptic/dynamical model of Uccellini
and Johnson (1979 hereafter UJ79
). In this model a straight jet streak, or wind maximum, within a long,
typically polar, jet stream is sustained by accelerations within its entrance
region due to the cross-stream pressure gradient force resulting in an
isallobaric wind component. Parcels that accelerate through the core of the jet
eventually turn to the right and decelerate as inertial-advective adjustments
dominate within the exit region. A four-cell velocity divergence/convergence
pattern develops wherein integrated velocity divergence in the left front
quadrant and velocity convergence in the right front quadrant result in
vertically integrated mass flux divergence/convergence tendencies and mean sea
level pressure falls and rises, respectively (note Fig.
1a
). Vertically varying
cooling and warming patterns due to adiabatic expansion and compression,
respectively, sustain thermal wind balance by producing cross-stream temperature
gradients consistent with a thermally indirect secondary circulation within the
exit region and thermally direct secondary circulation within the entrance
region. Warm advection is occurring within veering vertical winds and cold
advection is occurring within backing vertical winds under the exit and entrance
regions, respectively. Low-level pressure rises under the right exit region and
pressure falls under the left exit region induce a leftward-directed
cross-stream pressure gradient force and low-level return branch
circulation/ageostrophic component accompanying the isallobaric wind. This
results in the transport of relatively warm moist air under the ascending left
front quadrant and substantial destabilization.
This model is consistent with straight jet streaks or rotational wind
maxima with characteristic length scales of >1000 km and periods of 24–48 h.
Furthermore, the vertical motion patterns accompanying the four-cell pattern are
consistent with quasigeostrophic theory where upward increasing positive
vorticity advection and the Laplacian of warm advection coincide with the
maximum vertical wind shear and dynamical destabilization within the left front
quadrant of the jet streak. Thus, the UJ79
paradigm could be applied as a viable paradigm for the forecasting of areas
of severe convective potential from synoptic-scale datasets and numerical
models;that is, severe weather is anticipated just under the left exit region of
the jet streak where the cold and warm fronts meet accompanying a well-developed
surface cyclone. Most importantly, the vertical mass structure is coupled to the
thermal wind field through quasigeostrophic vertical motions. Therefore, the
strongest vertical wind shears and destabilization occur within the decelerating
mid–upper tropospheric flow since thermal wind balance is not significantly
violated!
While dynamical models with refinements in the structure of jet streaks
in their relationship to mid–upper tropospheric fronts and secondary
circulations have been published in recent years, for example, Shapiro
(1981) and Keyser
and Shapiro (1986) , wherein quasigeostrophic confluence and shearing
deformation accompanying flow curvature and differential thermal advection play
an important role in the relationship of vertical motion patterns to the exit or
entrance region of a jet streak, there has not been a widespread effort to
relate these studies to violent convection nor is there any indication that the
dynamics are unbalanced in any way; that is, the flow within the jet exit region
is still decelerating. Additionally, the mass/momentum fields are still coupled
assuming quasi- or semigeostrophic flow constraints wherein balanced, relatively
low Rossby number regimes still prevail. Thus, while these dynamical changes in
the relationship of jet streaks to vertical motion patterns have been observed
and simulated, quasigeostrophic theory and thermal wind balance still prevail in
describing the fundamental dynamics.
The complicating effects of multiple jet streaks have also been
investigated. Uccellini
and Kocin (1987) have related juxtaposed secondary circulations within the
polar and subtropical jet streaks to the development of East Coast cyclones but
have not extended their analyses to the role of these juxtaposed circulations in
organizing an environment conducive to severe convection. Furthermore, Lanicci
and Warner (1991a ,b
,c)
and Whitney
(1977) have related the juxtapositioning of the subtropical jet stream to
the polar jet stream as a favored location for severe convection. Lanicci and
Warner indicated that an elevated mixed layer (EML) accompanying “subtropical
circulations” was important in organizing the severe weather environment and
Whitney noted that cooling aloft accompanying the subtropical jet stream reduced
the static stability of the column; however, none of these studies explained how
the juxtaposed jet streak circulations and hot, dry elevated air mass from
Mexico dynamically interacted to produce a favorable environment for severe
convection; that is, no effort was made to diagnose the mass and momentum
adjustments within the region where these jet streak and continental airmass
features converged in space and time.
Two recent deadly tornadic outbreaks, both of which occurred in the
southeastern United States, have raised serious questions concerning our
understanding of the relationship between jet streak transverse secondary
circulations and the development of severe convective storms. During the middle
of the night of 28 November 1988, an F4 tornado struck Raleigh, North Carolina,
as part of an outbreak of tornadoes affecting Virginia and North Carolina. This
violent tornado occurred within the entrance region of a polar jet streak during
late autumn and during the early morning hours thus not conforming to either the
UJ79
theory or climatology. This prevented the National Weather Service from
issuing any tornado watch boxes prior to the development of the tornado (Gonski
et al. 1989 ; Kaplan
et al. 1995 ). In a somewhat similar vein, the absence of a strong polar jet
streak exit region and surface cyclone prompted the National Weather Service to
deem the Palm Sunday outbreak of 27–28 March 1994 as “not a synoptically evident
event.” Even though the National Weather Service produced timely watch boxes
over the observed severe weather outbreak region during this climatologically
more favorable period, questions existed concerning the unusual synoptic
location of the violent convection, again occurring closer to the polar jet
streak’s entrance region as opposed to the polar jet streak’s exit region, thus
violating the UJ79
paradigm. Given the fact that the synoptic-scale signals for these two
extreme tornadic development case studies were missing or very ambiguous, it
begs the question of whether we really understand the favorable hydrostatic
precursor processes to violent convection in the southeastern United States or,
for that matter, anywhere within the United States.
In an effort to explore this question, we will employ mesoscale
numerical model simulations and observations of the Palm Sunday outbreak to
formulate a new synoptic/dynamical overview for the large-scale circulation and
forcing that results in an environment favorable for severe convection. The new
paradigm synthesizes three primary concepts into a new vision of the hydrostatic
processes resulting in severe weather, thus producing a sequence of
quasigeostrophic and ageostrophic processes that differ from the previously
described theories. The three concepts that form the centerpiece of this new
paradigm include 1) the role of nearby transverse secondary circulations and
their deep quasigeostrophic vertical motions accompanying both the polar jet
streak entrance region and subtropical jet streak exit region, 2) geostrophic
adjustment of the mass to the wind field in proximity to the continental air
accompanying the return branch of the subtropical jet streak resulting in an
unbalanced midtropospheric mesoscale jet streak or jetlet, and 3) the vertical
advection of continental air accompanying the geostrophic adjustment process
that produces the jetlet in 2), resulting in unbalanced along-stream
circulations conducive to thermal and wind shear patterns that violate thermal
wind balance thus enhancing storm-relative helicity. It should be noted that an
unbalanced jetlet represents a mesoscale jet streak sustained by exit region
accelerations accompanying leftward-directed cross-stream ageostrophic flow in
contradistinction to the balanced flow within a jet streak exit region
accompanying the UJ79
paradigm. This unbalanced flow has been described in Kaplan
and Paine (1977) , Uccellini
et al. (1987) , Uccellini
and Koch (1987) , Zack
and Kaplan (1987) , Koch
and Dorian (1988) , and Kaplan
et al. (1997) .
In the next section of the paper we will describe the numerical
simulation experiment employed to better understand the sequence of processes
responsible for generating the mesoscale jetlet and along-stream circulation
that produced a favorable hydrostatic environment for severe weather over
Alabama and Georgia on 27 March 1994. Section
3 will be the first of several sections that describes, employing both
numerical simulations and observations, the multistage paradigm resulting in the
development of a favorable severe weather environment. In this section we will
diagnose the juxtaposed jet streak secondary circulations as well as an analysis
of the dissimilar low-level air masses resulting in boundary layer
frontogenesis. The effect of the low-level return branch circulations
accompanying very different air masses and total frontogenesis forced by
ageostrophic confluence and differential diabatic heating is examined. Section
4 follows by diagnosing from model output the effect of said processes on
the development of a midtropospheric subgeostrophic region accompanying the
intensifying boundary between the low-level cool and hot air masses. The
implications of this subgeostrophy for unbalanced jetlet development
accompanying leftward-directed cross-stream ageostrophic flow are examined. Section
5 will focus on the circulation accompanying the jetlet and the implications
for the development of storm-relative helicity and vertical vorticity. In section
6 we will summarize our results into a new dynamical model and clarify the
differences between this new theory and the UJ79
paradigm.
The numerical model employed for the mesoscale numerical simulation
experiments is the Mesoscale Atmospheric Simulation System (MASS) (Kaplan
et al. 1982 ; Kaplan
and Karyampudi 1992a ,b
; MESO 1995; Kaplan
et al. 1995 ; Kaplan
et al. 1996 ; Kaplan
et al. 1997 ; Manobianco
et al. 1996 ; Bauman
et al. 1997 ). The hydrostatic model characteristics are described in Table
1
. The numerical model
employs a Blackadar high-resolution planetary boundary layer and explicit
microphysics formulation. The numerical experiment involves both a coarse-mesh
and nested-grid fine-mesh full physics simulation integrated over the two
matrices, that is, 170 × 140 × 30 coarse-mesh and 200 × 150 × 33 fine-mesh grid
points depicted in Fig.
1b
. The coarse-mesh (
24 km) simulation was initialized
from conventional rawinsonde and surface datasets at 0000 UTC 27 March 1994 and
integrated for 24 h of real time. Additional bogussing was performed to enhance
the initial moisture fields based on radar and satellite datasets analogous to
Zack
et al. (1991) . Time-dependent lateral boundary conditions were derived from
temporally and spatially interpolated rawinsonde observations. The fine-mesh
(
12 km) simulation was
initialized at 0400 UTC and integrated for 20 h of real time. Initial and
time-dependent lateral boundary conditions for the fine-mesh simulation were
derived from the coarse-mesh simulation. The 12-km horizontal resolution has
been employed in conjunction with a convective parameterization scheme and been
shown to produce realistic hydrostatic convective ensembles/circulations in many
of the above-referenced numerical studies. Since the tornadic activity occurred
between 1700 UTC and 2300 UTC 27 March 1994 primarily in Alabama and Georgia,
the period of emphasis will focus on 1200 UTC 27 March–0000 UTC 28 March 1994
just upstream over Mississippi and Alabama.
Figures
2
and 3
depict the 200- and
150-mb NWS observations and analyses as well as the analyzed ageostrophic wind
components and Q-vector convergence fields over the southeastern and
south-central United States all valid at 1200 UTC 27 March. Furthermore, Fig.
8
depicts the 300-mb
observed total and ageostrophic wind components at the same time. These figures
indicate that at 1200 UTC two jet streaks are evident. The northern jet or polar
jet (PJ) is most evident at 200 mb and centered over southern Illinois and a
southern jet or subtropical jet (STJ) is, relatively speaking, more evident at
150 and 300 mb. The entrance region of the PJ at 200 mb and its
leftward-directed cross-stream ageostrophic flow is best developed over eastern
Oklahoma, northeastern Texas, and western Arkansas. The exit region of the STJ
can be seen at 300, 200, and 150 mb over eastern Alabama, western Georgia, and
the Florida Panhandle extending southward off the Gulf of Mexico coast. The
along-stream velocity gradient at 300, 200, and 150 mb within the exit region of
the STJ exists over the region from Mississippi to Georgia [note the region in
between Jackson, Mississippi (JAN), and Waycross, Georgia (AYS), at 300, 200,
and 150 mb in Figs.
2a
and 8a
] while a reversed
gradient of wind velocity exists within the entrance region of the PJ over
central Texas [note the region between Longview, Texas (GGG), and Midland, Texas
(MAF), in Figs.
2a
and 8a
]. Thus, the most
significant magnitude of both the PJ entrance region’s leftward-directed
ageostrophic flow and the STJ exit region’s rightward-directed ageostrophic flow
within the 300–150-mb layer as diagnosed from Figs.
2b
, 3b
, and 8b
is likely to occur after
1200 UTC over the region in between the Florida Panhandle/southern Georgia and
northeastern Texas, that is, northern and central Mississippi and western
Alabama. As will be shown, this region closely follows the observed
development and propagation of intense convection some 3–6 h later. Note
how portions of this region exhibit a significant signal of quasigeostrophic
ascent at 200 and 150 mb as diagnosed from Q-vector convergence
fields in Figs.
2c
and 3c
. Most of the state of
Mississippi exhibits Q-vector convergence at 200 and 150 mb in Figs.
2c
and 3c
, consistent with
rightward-directed ageostrophic flow to the southeast over Alabama and the
Florida gulf coast depicted in Figs.
2b
and 3b
.
To diagnose this juxtapositioning of jet streaks at 1200 UTC, the
rawinsonde data were employed to calculate transverse ageostrophic circulations
relative to the vertical cross section oriented from Cape Girardeau, Missouri
(CGI), within the entrance region of the PJ and Pensacola, Florida (PNS), within
the exit region of the STJ (note Fig.
1b
for location). The middle
of the cross section traverses eastern Mississippi and western Alabama and is
centered above Columbus, Mississippi (CBM), the location of the incipient deep
convection that develops between 1400 and 1500 UTC affecting eastern Alabama
with tornadoes by shortly after 1700 UTC (note Fig.
15
). Figure
4
depicts the dual vertical
circulations with the following signals: 1) southeastward-directed cross-stream
ageostrophic flow above 350 mb south of CBM, 2) northwestward-directed
cross-stream ageostrophic flow between CGI and CBM within the 600–300-mb layer,
3) low-level northwestward-directed return branch cross-stream ageostrophic flow
directed from PNS to CBM below 850 mb, 4) low-level southeastward-directed
return branch cross-stream ageostrophic flow directed from CGI to CBM below 700
mb, and 5) a descending/near zero vertical motion circulation couplet well south
of CBM centered near 350 mb and an ascending/descending couplet centered well
north of CBM between 700 and 300 mb. The PJ circulation produces ascending
vertical motions from 400 mb to the surface while the STJ circulation produces a
weakness in descending flow directly above the PJ ascent near where the
Q-vector computations indicate upward quasigeostrophic vertical motions
at 200 and 150 mb, that is, over northern Mississippi. This indicates that
both branches are inducing the deepest ascent and ageostrophic confluent
low-level flow as well as ageostrophic diffluent upper-level flow over and/or
just south of CBM at 1200 UTC. The arrows in Fig.
4
indicate juxtaposed
indirect and direct transverse secondary circulation cells about the STJ and PJ,
respectively, consistent with dual transverse balanced secondary circulations.
Note, also that the most significant slope in the isentropes occurs over CBM
below 700 mb where continental air is located.
Figures
5a–c
depict the 1200 UTC NWS
850- and 700-mb observations and analyses as well as 850-mb Q-vector
forcing, respectively. Evident are three air masses and two regions of
ageostrophic flow. Air of polar origin over the southern plains region [as
exemplified by the near 0°C 850-mb temperatures at Amarillo, Texas (AMA),
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma (OKC), and Monette, Missouri (MON)] is coming into
juxtaposition with maritime tropical air over the southeastern United States and
most of the gulf coastal states [as exemplified by the nearly saturated air with
near 15°C 850-mb temperatures at Corpus Christi, Texas (CRP), Lake Charles,
Louisiana (LCH), Slidell, Louisiana (SIL), and Tallahassee, Florida (TLH)]. The
850-mb dewpoint depressions are very small throughout most of the gulf coastal
region; however, hot dry air of Mexican origin is evident over south Texas at
Brownsville (BRO) along the Gulf of Mexico coast at both 850 and 700 mb. This
continental air is exemplified by the very warm temperatures exceeding 25°C at
850 mb and equaling or exceeding 10°C at 700 mb as well as large dewpoint
depressions over the gulf coastal states, for example, at BRO, CRP, and SIL.
Thus, the Mexican air is likely being advected from the open waters of the Gulf
of Mexico east of BRO in the southwesterly flow above the maritime tropical air
along the Gulf of Mexico coastal region. Southerly ageostrophic, that is,
leftward-directed, flow is evident along the gulf coast at 850 mb at SIL
indicative of the return branch of the STJ transverse ageostrophic secondary
circulation (Fig.
5d
) while northerly
ageostrophic flow is evident behind the cold front at almost every 850-mb
station slicing from west Texas through central Tennessee indicative of the
low-level ageostrophic return branch under the entrance region of the PJ. Figures
5d,e
indicate how the
low-level return branch circulation and ageostrophic observations are colocated
in space. Figures
4
and 5
clearly show that in
between these two low-level return branch circulations quasigeostrophic forcing
is producing ascending motion particularly at 850 mb over Mississippi and
western Alabama under the ascent depicted in Figs.
2–4
. The hot dry air at 700
mb is nearly coincident with the leading edge of southerly ageostrophic flow at
850 and 700 mb implying that the Mexican air is being advected toward the
north-northeast above the maritime tropical air as part of the low-level return
branch of the STJ’s transverse secondary circulation and is coming into
proximity with the polar air under the PJ entrance region’s transverse secondary
circulation over eastern Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi where Q-vector
convergence exists (note Fig.
5c
). The sloping lower
tropospheric isentropic surfaces above and north of CBM depicted in Fig.
4
are signals of this
increasing baroclinic structure in between the continental and polar air
masses.
By 0000 UTC, as can be seen in Figs.
6a,b
and 7a,b
, which are the
complements of Figs.
2a,b
and 3a,b
, the split/dual jet
structure is quite evident from northeastern Mississippi to western South
Carolina. Rightward-directed cross-stream ageostrophic flow is quite evident
from CBM to the Florida coastal plain, with an along-stream decrease in wind
velocity centered over Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina at 200 mb, and is
shifted somewhat southward at 150 mb. While most of the wind observations at
these levels have been blown away within the PJ entrance region, at 300 and 500
mb at both 1200 and 0000 UTC (Figs.
8a
and 9a
), strong signals of
leftward-directed cross-stream ageostrophic flow are evident over northern
Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia (note the analyses in Figs.
8b
and 9b
). The complement of Fig.
4
, that is, Fig.
10
, indicates how the dual
circulation structure has been replaced largely by a single leftward-directed
ageostrophic jetlet that overwhelms the background (larger scale)
quasigeostrophic secondary circulations with an ascending vertical motion
maximum over northern Alabama and Mississippi near 500 mb. At 850 mb, in Figs.
11a,c
, the leftward-directed
ageostrophic flow accompanying a low-level jet maximum exceeding 25 m s
1 is quite evident at
Centerville, Alabama (CKL), and Athens, Georgia (AHN), with high temperatures
and low dewpoint depressions, while rightward-directed ageostrophic flow can be
found from CRP to JAN behind the cold front in the cold moist air indicating the
converging low-level jets that may be signals of the return branch circulations
of the dual jet streaks and/or additional signals of unbalanced low-level jets.
The hot dry air has been restricted to the Florida Panhandle at 850 mb as
indicated by large dewpoint depression at TLH while at 700 mb the dry air is
largely absent even though it is very warm along the immediate southern Atlantic
coastal plain (Fig.
11b
). The leftward-directed
and rightward-directed ageostrophic wind components depicted in Fig.
11d
are evident above the
aforementioned 850-mb features that are consistent with low-level return branch
circulations. Thus, even after the tornado outbreak, polar, maritime tropical,
and continental air are observed to be still juxtaposed at low levels due, in
part, to the ageostrophic return branch circulations accompanying dual jet
streaks.
Figures
12
and 13
depict the substantial
areal coverage, depth, and time continuity of the two quasigeostrophic
circulations as well as their effects upon the low-level thermal gradients as
diagnosed from the coarse-mesh MASS model simulations and observations. The dual
transverse circulations, airmass origins, and prolonged transport, as well as
the relative locations of the air masses to frontal formation, can be more
accurately diagnosed from the much higher resolution structure that is available
from the MASS mesoscale model simulation. Figure
12
depicts the dual
circulation structure with the added detail in the model indicating that the
circulations produce ascent throughout the column above CBM to 200 mb with the
exception of the layer between 600 and 800 mb. Just northwest of CBM, a very
strong ascent maximum can be found accompanying the low-level circulation above
the surface cold front with saturated air. The frontogenetical nature of this
circulation is evident as low
e air near the
surface converges toward high
e air accompanying
low-level return branch circulations under the PJ and STJ, respectively,
analogous to the observations in Fig.
4
. The multicellular
thermally indirect and thermally direct circulations are rather similar to those
observed from rawinsonde data in Fig.
4
. The ascent maximum
between 550 and 250 mb is sandwiched between the upward branches of the STJ and
PJ thermally indirect and thermally direct transverse ageostrophic circulations
similar to the observations depicted in Fig.
4
. The low-level
e minimum
surging southeastward is, in part, sustained by precipitation falling into the
surface layer resulting in additional evaporational cooling, that is, the
rain-cooled cold front (RCCF). Thus the low-level return branch circulation
under the PJ entrance region is being enhanced by diabatic cooling. Just south
of CBM, between 500 and 800 mb, is a warm and dry layer of air indicative of a
secondary elevated
e minimum. The flow
vectors indicate that this air is being transported from the southwest between
CBM and PNS under the STJ and is drier than the air underneath it. In effect,
this warm and dry air enhances the midtropospheric temperature gradient between
the PJ and the region southeast of the cold front. Hence, it is located close to
the observed dry and warm layer, likely of Mexican origin within the 700–850-mb
layer near the Gulf of Mexico coast. In the remainder of the paper the thermal
gradient south of the polar front established by the advection of continental
air will be referred to as the “continental front” (CF), which is analogous to
the “lid edge” in Lanicci
and Warner (1991a) . Figures
12a,b
indicate that this
continental front is located just south of CBM as both model and observations
(note the 600–700-mb dry wedge in the soundings depicted in Figs.
17a,b
) agree on its location
during the 1200–1800 UTC time period.
In Fig.
13a
we can see that parcels
calculated from model-simulated three-dimensional winds, arriving at 500 mb over
southeastern Mississippi shortly after 1200 UTC, originated below 600 mb at 0700
UTC just east of CRP. CRP was clearly in the hot dry air of Mexican origin at
this time as diagnosed from the 1200 UTC 27 March 700-mb rawinsonde observation
at BRO depicted in Fig.
5b
as well as the 0000 UTC
27 March rawinsonde observations (not shown). Southeastern Mississippi is the
location of the elevated CF near PNS in Figs.
12a,b
. Note the extraordinary
heat of the parcel originating at 750 mb, with the simulated temperature
approaching 20°C at this high elevation (which is close to the average of the
observed 1200 UTC temperatures at BRO in Figs.
5a,b
)! These parcels are
ascending rapidly and turning toward the left as they become part of the
low-level return branch of the STJ, while at the same time parcels at 850 mb (Fig.
13b
) are located down at 932
mb over the open waters of the Gulf of Mexico, indicative of a probable maritime
tropical environment/air mass structure. To substantiate their maritime origin
note that these parcels are actually cooler at 870 mb than the parcels
originating near CRP were at 750 mb, some
1200 m higher. Additionally the descent and
rightward turning of parcels over Arkansas and northern Louisiana is indicative
of the low-level return branch of the PJ. These parcel motions are consistent
with the ageostrophic low-level return branch circulations inferred from Figs.
4
and 5d,e
. Note that parcels
descending behind the cold front over extreme northern Mississippi are cooling,
indicative of evaporational cooling effects (overwhelming compressional heating
effects) that act to enhance the low-level RCCF boundary depicted in Figs.
12a,b
, 13b
, and 16a–d
, that is, the boundary
between the continental front and polar front. All of these parcels originate
well in excess of 500 km away from CBM during the 8-h period prior to the first
violent weather over central Alabama. This indicates the large scale of the
circulations affecting this region prior to the severe weather.
The simulated and observed transverse circulations and trajectories
paint the following mosaic of the atmosphere above CBM prior to the development
of the convection that eventually produced the initial Palm Sunday tornadoes.
Two large-scale circulations were affecting the transport of parcels into the
region above CBM on or about 1200 UTC over a region of at least 500 × 500 km if
not much larger. Ascent throughout most of the column resulted from the
juxtaposed low-level return branches of the PJ and STJ. Air parcels, which
originated from both the Gulf of Mexico and near the Texas–Mexico border region
6–12 h earlier, were being lifted under the STJ. The transport under the STJ
exit region resulted in the development of warm dry air over warm moist air as
well as a secondary mid–lower-tropospheric front south of the polar front and PJ
secondary circulation. The juxtapositioning of the PJ transverse entrance region
circulation enhanced the deep ascent, producing a diabatically modified surface
front accompanying cold advection and precipitation, both of which produced a
very sharp low-level
e boundary. All of
these processes are driven by deep prolonged quasigeostrophic circulation cells.
Figure
14
depicts schematically, in
a vertical and horizontal plain, the PJ–STJ circulation structures and coupled
physical processes diagnosed from both observations and model output in the
previous section. The ultimate consequence of these dynamics is the increase
in the mid–lower-tropospheric northwestward-directed pressure gradient
force. This increase in northwestward-directed pressure gradient force
accompanies the lower tropospheric frontogenesis across Mississippi shortly
before the tornadic convection develops over Alabama at 1730 UTC 27 March
1994.
Figures
15–19
depict key observed
fields that span the time period between 1200 UTC 27 March and 0000 UTC 28 March
1994. This is roughly 6 h before and 6 h after the first major tornado that
affected northeastern Alabama shortly before 1800 UTC. These fields collectively
indicate that the region bounded on the north by Huntsville, Alabama (HSV), on
the west by JAN, on the south by Montgomery, Alabama (MGM/XMR), and on the east
by Atlanta, Georgia (ATL), or roughly centered on CKL represented a region of
mid–lowertropospheric warming and significant mid–lowertropospheric
accelerations shortly before and nearly coincident with the eruption of violent
convection. In Figs.
15a,b
can be seen the
development of a separate area of convection near CBM shortly before 1500 UTC
that becomes severe by 1635 UTC (note Figs.
15c,d
). This mesoscale
convective system (MCS) rapidly intensifies and propagates eastward across the
region between HSV and MGM/XMR just south of the west–east-oriented surface cold
boundary depicted in Figs.
16a–d
. This MCS, depicted in Figs.
15b–d
, is clearly a separate
feature from the much shallower convection to the north of the cold boundary
near HSV along the Alabama–Tennessee border region (Langmaid
et al. 1996 ). The magnitude of the cross-stream temperature gradient across
the west–east boundary between HSV and MGM/XMR increases orthogonal to the path
of the MCS during the 1200–2100 UTC period as can be seen depicted in Figs.
16a–d
. The increase of surface
temperature at MGM/XMR in the surface southerly ageostrophic flow regime (+7°C)
is considerably larger than the decrease of surface temperature at HSV in the
surface northerly ageostrophic flow regime (
3°C). The combination results in an
increase of surface cross-stream frontal intensity between MGM/XMR and HSV from
6°C (200 km)
1 to
16°C (200 km)
1 or an increase of
167% in 9 h. This frontogenesis is due, in
large part, to ageostrophic confluence where the northerly cross-isobaric flow
at HSV is juxtaposed by southerly cross-isobaric flow at MGM/XMR. Said surface
frontogenesis has been calculated by Langmaid
et al. (1996) , who found it to be largely the result of ageostrophic
confluence. However, the frontogenesis is also coincident with the
Q-vector ascent diagnosed from Fig.
5c
at 1200 UTC. Thus, the
frontogenesis is likely the result of diabatically modified quasigeostrophic
forcing accompanying the juxtaposed ageostrophic low-level return branch
circulations under the PJ and STJ during its incipient stages, that is, from
1200 to 1500 UTC, or prior to convective development. Furthermore, this
surface frontogenesis is occurring just below the region where the MASS model
indicated the northeastward transport of hot Mexican air depicted in Figs.
12
and 13
into southern Mississippi
and southwestern Alabama by 1200 UTC. Specifically, Fig.
12b
depicts the progression
of hot dry 700-mb air with temperatures
8°C, that is, potential temperatures
310 K, during the 30-h period
preceding 1800 UTC. Evident is the warm dry tongue approaching CKL as diagnosed
from the special soundings depicted in Figs.
17a,b
at CKL and JAN (Hales
and Vescio 1996 ). This hot dry air pool is nearly coincident with the
7°–11°C surface temperature increase during the 1200–2100 UTC period over
central and eastern Alabama, that is, at MGM/XMR, or <100 km south of the
region of tornadic thunderstorms, that is, the severe weather accompanying the
MCS depicted in Figs.
15b–d.
The combination of the
700-mb warm dry airmass signal, extraordinary late March surface heating with
surface temperatures exceeding 30°C, and motion of the MCS all indicate the
likelihood that the devastating weather is occurring along a west–southwest- to
east–northeast-oriented boundary somewhat, that is,
50–100 km, south of the surface cold air
boundary over northern Alabama and Georgia near HSV.
Figures
17
and 18
unambiguously indicate
that the region between JAN, CKL, HSV, and MGM/XMR, within this area of surface
heating, is also a region of extraordinary accelerating flow within the
midtroposphere during the 1200–1800 UTC time period or roughly coincident with
MCS development and low-level temperature increases. Note how the wind velocity
at the two sounding locations depicted in Figs.
17a,b
have increased from their
1200 UTC values within the 500–700-mb layer only; that is,
upper-level, 400–200-mb winds actually decrease slightly during this 6-h
period. This increase indicates that a secondary wind maximum has formed below
400 mb (Hales
and Vescio 1996 ). Furthermore, the profiler at MGM/XMR depicted in Fig.
18
shows this increase
starting at about 1500 UTC or the time of the development of the MCS just to the
south of nearby CBM. This secondary wind maximum is occurring almost exactly
coincident with the dry wedge in the soundings at CKL and JAN (Hales
and Vescio 1996 ) at 700 mb, indicative of continental air. The location of
the increasing flow at 500 and 700 mb is sustained through 0000 UTC as can be
inferred from Figs.
10
, 11b,
11d
, and 19a–b
, which indicates a
leftward-directed ageostrophic flow at CKL with an extraordinary magnitude at
500 mb, in particular, of
45 m
s
1. These wind
observations offer proof that a secondary wind maximum has developed just south
of the MCS over central Alabama before 1800 UTC. The wind maximum dominates the
flow within the middle troposphere. Also, its orientation has a sufficiently
large southerly component to force it to cross the larger-scale isoheights
within the midtroposphere directed to the left of the background stream under
the exit region of the STJ. It is clearly positioned closer to the STJ exit
region over Alabama and Georgia than it is positioned relative to the PJ
entrance region over northeastern Texas, Arkansas, and western Tennessee at this
time. It is also clearly in proximity to the transport of very warm air
northward within the lower troposphere. It is likely, therefore, that this wind
maximum is neither associated directly with the PJ, as it is too far to the
south, nor is it associated directly with the STJ as it is too low; furthermore,
it is too high in altitude to be a low-level jet that is coupled directly to the
secondary transverse circulations about either the STJ or PJ. It is located
within the 400–700-mb layer between the upper and lower branches of the
transverse secondary circulations. We will investigate its origins with
nested-grid simulation datasets in the next section.
To understand the mechanism for the intensification of the
midtropospheric jetlet, which is observed in proximity to the severe weather and
700-mb surface warming over Alabama and Georgia on and after 1800 UTC, one must
diagnose the relationship between the mass and momentum field in proximity to
the continental front along the Gulf of Mexico coastal region several hours
earlier. First, however, in order to establish the credibility of the
nested-grid simulation, which was initialized at 0400 UTC, we will briefly
compare the critically important simulated low-level thermal structure to 850-
and 700-mb rawinsonde observations depicted in Figs.
5a and 5b
, respectively, along the
gulf coast. Note that, at 1200 UTC, observed temperatures at 850 and 700 mb
indicate a warm air tongue with values
17° and 8°C, respectively, located from the
northernmost Texas gulf coast to southeastern Mississippi. This warm tongue is
coincident with relatively dry air at 700 mb that overlays very moist air at 850
mb. Figures
20
and 21
depict nested-grid
simulated 850- and 700-mb temperature, winds, and height values at 1200 UTC. A
comparison indicates that at 1200 UTC the fields closely mimic the rawinsonde
observations of a warm tongue of air from east Texas to southern Mississippi.
Most impressive is that the model is able to replicate the northward movement of
the 8°C (
= 310 K)
isotherm at 700 mb to an east–west line between Lufkin, Texas (LUF), and Laurel,
Mississippi (LUL), which is nearly coincident with the location of the CF
depicted in Fig.
12b
. One can also see in Fig.
22
, which depicts a 1100 UTC
cross section normal to the deep air stream from near Stephenville, Texas (SEP),
to near Houston, Texas (HOU), that the warm pool at 850 and 700 mb is a
reflection of a three-dimensional (continental) frontal zone (CF) displaced to
the southeast of the larger-scale frontal zone supporting the PJ entrance region
over northeastern Texas at 1200 UTC. This warm pool is inferred from the
downfolded lower tropospheric isentropic surfaces northeast of HOU just south of
the strong ascending flow. Also evident in Fig.
22
is that there is a
secondary 500-mb jetlet simulated to be in proximity to the coastal warm air
tongue as diagnosed from the downfolded isentropes just northeast of HOU at 1200
UTC. These two features, that is, the southward-displaced warm front and the
secondary 500-mb jetlet are simulated analogs to the observations depicted in
the previous subsection. As is shown in Hamilton
et al. (1998) this jetlet results from the interaction of the convection and
the continental front prior to 1100 UTC.
To examine this interaction and the proceeding geostrophic adjustment
process leading to jetlet formation, two trajectories initialized at the center
of the coarse simulated 500-mb jetlet have been computed (Table
2
). Figures
22c,d
reveal the simulated
latent heat release and isotachs at the time of trajectory initialization. The
acceleration of the parcels in the vicinity of the 500-mb jetlet occur during a
time when the pressure gradient force tendency undergoes marked amplification
and begins to dominate the force balance acting upon the parcel. This is
reflected in the examination of the total acceleration and pressure gradient
force values for the two selected parcels. Parcel 1 was chosen at the time just
prior to the initial detection of the simulated 500-mb jetlet. The parcel
accelerates at the modest rate between 0700 and 1000 UTC, then develops an
increasingly large cross-stream ageostrophic component, and accelerates rapidly
to the speed of 42 m s
1. A predominant pressure gradient
force (
10
3 m s
2), and an assisting increase in
centripetal acceleration, aids in both the extreme increase in ageostrophic wind
magnitude and leftward turning of parcel 1. After 1000 UTC the parcel becomes
supergeostrophic and begins to decelerate. Parcel 2 undergoes a similar
adjustment but experiences a larger acceleration from 1100 to 1200 UTC. The
parcel becomes exposed to an increasingly large cross-stream ageostrophic
component and reaches a maximum velocity of 54 m s
1 by 1300 UTC.
Figures
20–22
indicate how air
transported northeastward from south Texas and the Mexican plateau form a
secondary (continental) frontal system under and to the southeast of the polar
front baroclinic zone, which aids in the maintenance of the jetlet that develops
near HOU at 1100 UTC. This secondary front is simulated to rapidly propagate
from near the Lousiana–Texas border region southeast of LUF at 1200 UTC to
north-central Alabama near CKL at 1800 UTC. The front can be seen to form at 850
and 700 mb to the southeast of the northernmost mesolow (NM), which sweeps
northeastward from southwest of Greenville, Mississippi (GLH), at 1500 UTC to
north of Birmingham, Alabama (BHM), at 1800 UTC. It is this NM in conjunction
with the intensifying secondary CF that is the key to the severe weather that
soon develops downstream over Alabama. As this secondary frontal system
translates east–northeastward, the southeast–northwest height gradient within
the troposphere increases across the same region. For example, between JAN and
Columbus, Georgia (CSG), the 850-mb height gradient depicted in Fig.
20
increases from
45 m (500 km)
1 to
75 m (500 km)
1 during the 1200–1700 UTC time
period. This nearly 67% increase in the cross-stream midtropospheric height
gradient reflects the combined effects of 1) the southeastward movement of the
cold front, including the cooling accompanying rain-cooled air (RCCF); 2) the
east–northeastward movement of the warm air accompanying the secondary warm pool
along the gulf coast, that is, CF; and 3) the release of latent heat as
simulated MCSs form within the conditionably unstable air accompanying the
downfolded isentropes depicted in Fig.
22
just north of the
continental front. Propagating along this height gradient are two 850-mb
mesolows positioned at 1200 UTC (note Fig.
20a
) just downstream from
their observed surface location depicted in Fig.
16a
. The most important
northern 850-mb mesolow (NM) is located over southern Arkansas near El Dorado
(ELD) by 1200 UTC and a second is located over eastern Texas near LUF as can be
seen depicted in Fig.
20a
. The increasing height
gradient southeast of the mesolows, that is, between the cold air over northern
Mississippi and the hot air over southeastern Mississippi acts to induce
multiple regions of subgeostrophy between these two low-level air pools, that
is, between the southeastward-directed cold and rain-cooled PJ low-level return
branch and the warm continental air that is caught up in the low-level
north-northwesterly directed return branch of the STJ as can be seen in Figs.
23c,d
and 24c,d
during the 1700–1800 UTC
period (note also the simulated trajectories in Fig.
13
to see the confluence of
different air masses). During the period between 1500 and 1800 UTC this region
of subgeostrophy, caused by the intensifying cross-stream height gradient to the
southeast of NM, in particular, propagates from southwestern Louisiana near AEX
to northcentral Alabama near HSV and, as it does so, rotates toward the right
foreward flank of the 50 m s
1 500-mb jetlet maximum (UJ), thus
producing UJS. By 1700 UTC, an unbalanced jetlet convergence maxima (UJCM) can
be seen to form in Figs.
20c
and 21c
ahead of the accelerating
850- and 700-mb jetlets’ exit region between JAN and HSV. This lies under the
UJS in the right front quadrant of the unbalanced 500-mb jetlet. One region of
subgeostrophy located from northeastern Texas through western Tennessee is north
of the cold front as diagnosed from the packing of the isotherms and cold
advection at 850 mb in Fig.
20
. Here, the northwestern
periphery of latent heating maxima extend back over the cold air producing
intense regions of subgeostrophy (note Fig.
12a
). The secondary
southeastward shifted maxima of subgeostrophy (UJS) represents secondary
geostrophic wind maxima just north of the continental front, that is, the 8°C
700-mb isotherm where the thermal wind structure of the simulated atmosphere
departs from geostrophic balance as a result of the wedging of the continental
air at low levels under the deep diffluent circulations between the two jet
streaks and just southeast of the rain-cooled cold air (note Figs.
12a
and 13b
). In effect, the thermal
perturbation resulting from the wedging of continental air into the lower
troposphere juxtaposed with the southward-propagating RCCF and latent heat
release in simulated convection north of the continental front enhances the
northwestward-directed low-level pressure gradient force increasing the
potential for thermal wind imbalance, particularly if rightward-directed
supergeostrophic flow develops aloft. The scale of the UJS (note Figs.
23c,d
and 24c,d
for the signal of these
features to 500 mb between JAN and HSV) and subsequent simulated jetlet is
consistent with that of a sub-Rossby radius of deformation (
R) circulation as
dictated by the following expression from Kaplan
et al. (1997) :

is the relative vorticity.
Using simulated representative values of these variables over CBM within the
simulated convective region at 1700 UTC of N = 1.15 × 10
3 s
1, H = 9.0 × 10
3 m, f = 7 ×
10
5 s
1, VR
1 = 1 × 10
4 s
1, and
=
4 × 10
5 s
1 results in a Rossby radius value of
300 km. Since the rotational
wind is not the mechanism of adjustment at scales of motion shorter than 300 km,
the mass field rather than the wind field adjusts in such an unbalanced flow
regime. As can be seen in Figs.
23c,d
and 24c,d
, the increasing
subgeostrophy is accompanying an increasing leftward-directed ageostrophic
jetlet (UJLDA) that develops over eastern Texas near LUF at 1200 UTC and
explosively propagates east–northeastward to be over northwestern Alabama
between CKL and HSV by 1700 UTC. The simulated increasing winds of >25 m
s
1 at 850 mb and
>35 m s
1 at 700
mb depicted in Figs.
20c,d
and 21c,d
are somewhat stronger and
develop sooner than observed in Figs.
17–18
; however, their location
is consistent with the concept of accelerating mid–lower-tropospheric flow in
proximity to the continental front and newly developing MCS between JAN and CKL
just before 1800 UTC.
The movement of the simulated leftward-directed ageostrophy (UJLDA) and
the simulated subgeostrophy (UJS) regions at 500 mb within the exit region of
the UJ can be seen depicted in Figs.
23c,d
and 24c,d
, respectively, for the
1700–1800 UTC period. This jetlet, or sub-Rossby radius of deformation jet
streak, which develops southeast of the PJ entrance region due to the combined
effects of the upstream continental front and its accompanying convection prior
to 1200 UTC (Fig.
22
), is decidedly unbalanced
in structure. It propagates along the same path of the observed MCS that
develops over CBM shortly after 1435 UTC, that is, it moves from northeast of
HOU at 1200 UTC, to north-central Louisiana near AEX at 1500 UTC, to
northeastern Mississippi near CBM at 1700 UTC, and then into southwestern
Tennessee and northwestern Alabama west of HSV by 1800 UTC, thus moving at a
velocity in excess of 30 m s
1 accompanying the NM depicted in Fig.
20
. It is unbalanced because
the mass perturbations resulting from the lower tropospheric warm pool as well
as simulated latent heating, produce subgeostrophic (UJS) and
leftward-directed accelerating flow (UJLDA) within the right exit region of the
jetlet, which is inconsistent with the balanced UJ79
model of a jet streak secondary circulation wherein said flow occurs in the
right entrance region. In effect, the jetlet is not in thermal wind balance due
to its highly ageostrophic structure resulting from the heating-induced mass
perturbation, for example, Kaplan
et al. 1997 . Ascent and adiabatic cooling (UJRFA and UJRFCP) occur
where sinking is supposed to be occurring based on balanced jet streak
dynamics (note Figs.
24h
and 28d
). This 500-mb
leftward-directed ageostrophy, subgeostrophy, ascent, and cooling within the
right foreward flank of the jetlet can be seen propagating east–northeastward
from northeastern Mississippi near CBM at 1700 UTC to northwestern Alabama near
HSV by 1800 UTC in Figures
23c,d
; 24c,d;
24g,h
; and 28c,d
as features denoted by
the labels UJLDA, UJS, UJRFA, and UJRFCP, respectively. The jetlet is
essentially propagating along the northwestern periphery of the warm wedge (lid
edge/CF) at 700 mb and the secondary subgeostrophic region formed about this
wedge is displaced to the southeast of the subgeostrophy accompanying the PJ
entrance region. The warm advection at 700 and 850 mb as well as the surface
sensible heating (note Figs.
20a,c
; 21a,c
;and 25a,c
over southern Mississippi
and Alabama accompanying the NM) act to reinforce the development of the
continental front surfaceward. As this occurs the thermal wind imbalance
accompanying the southward-shifted ageostrophy is maintained south of the polar
front, providing a preferred region for the development and maintenance of the
unbalanced jetlet.
By 1700 UTC, the wind velocity at 500 mb increases to
45 m s
1 depicted in Fig.
24c
near CKL, which is
slightly exceeding the value in the observed CKL sounding depicted in Fig.
17b
. The jetlet is a
continuously self-generating feature wherein 1) wave–CISK (conditional
instability of the second kind) acts to maintain midtropospheric outflow and
cooling, 2) the CISK occurs above surface sensible heating, 3) the surface
heating occurs ahead of latent heating and midtropospheric warming, which is 4)
above low-level evaporational cooling upstream from the surface sensible
heating. The details of how CISK maintains the unbalanced jetlet will be
described employing both MASS model and idealized simulations by Hamilton
et al. (1998) , which is a companion paper in this journal. Figures
25
and 26
indicate, however, that
as the first surface mesolow (NM) with its pronounced low-level confluence and
along-stream vorticity/inflow structure (UJSC and UJSVM) propagates from
northwestern Mississippi near CBM to northeastern Alabama near HSV during the
1700–1800 UTC time period, the midtropospheric jetlet and its right flank
cooling (UJRFA) result in the superpositioning of midtropospheric outflow and
low-level inflow (UJSC) to the right of the background core of the unbalanced
jetlet. The inflow, that is, unbalanced jetlet surface confluence (UJSC in Fig.
25c
) accompanying the first
mesolow (NM), is obvious from the increasing surface absolute vertical vorticity
maximum exceeding 1 × 10
4 s
1 (note the unbalanced jetlet surface
vertical vorticity maximum that is located near HSV in Fig.
26d
). This vertical vorticity
maximum is approaching the region of tornadogenesis over northeastern Alabama at
1800 UTC in Fig.
26d
to the southeast of the
surface rain-cooled cold front (RCCF in Fig.
25d
) and to the northeast of
the surface warm front (CF in Fig.
25d
).
The observed thermally direct circulation producing cooling ahead of
the leftward-directed ageostrophic 500-mb flow depicted in Figs.
10
and 19
provide observational
evidence for the unbalanced nature of the midtropospheric flow and the
downstream cooling accompanying it. Note the structure of the simulated cross
section at 1600 UTC depicted in Fig.
27
over the region of the
observed intensifying MCS where a region of intense ascent has formed along the
right flank of the jetlet near CBM.
c. Summary
A midtropospheric wind maximum is observed to develop in proximity to
the region where severe weather occurs over northcentral Alabama. The
nested-grid simulation indicates that the wind maximum is part of a mesoscale
jetlet that develops between the exit region of the STJ and entrance region of
the PJ. The jetlet is the result of the increasing southeast–northwest-oriented
pressure gradient force between the convectively (diabatically) modified
low-level return branches of the transverse ageostrophic secondary circulations.
The jetlet is unbalanced because subgeostrophy and ascent are maintained by
wave–CISK within the right foreward flank of the jetlet, which enhances right
foreward cooling above inflowing planetary boundary layer air. In essence, the
jetlet represents the component of a gravity wave that propagates within the
conditionally unstable air between the continental and polar fronts and is
sustained by wave–CISK.
5. Implications of the unbalanced jetlet for severe weather development Return to TOC
Recently, one of the most widely applied paradigms relating the
larger-scale environment to severe storm formation and intensification involves
the concept of storm-relative helicity (Davies-Jones
1984 ). Storm-relative helicity (SRH) is defined by Eq.
(2):

a. Observations
The only observed data available to shed light on the increase of SRH
and the low-level horizontal vorticity in proximity to the severe weather
involves the surface observations, MGM/XMR profiler, and the 1800 UTC CKL
sounding. The surface flow at MGM/XMR does increase during the morning from the
south, while the MGM/XMR profiler indicates a gradual increase of southwesterly
wind flow at
3000 m between
1430 and 1530 UTC. Also, the 1800 UTC CKL sounding indicates an increase in
700-mb flow to
32 m s
1. This should be contrasted
with the earlier 1200 UTC observations that indicate weaker values of winds at
both levels and somewhat weaker directional shear. Thus, the vertical wind shear
is increasing in time. Also, it should be noted that convective cell motion is
to the right of the mean column flow at CKL indicating an environment with
significant values of SRH.
b. Simulations
Figures
20–21
and 25–29
define how the
nested-grid simulation indicates that the vertical wind shear and static
stability are rapidly changing during the 1200–1800 UTC time period. These
changes produce an environment favorable for juxtaposed SRH increases with
low-level horizontal vorticity increases over central Alabama during the
1200–1800 UTC time period. Figures
21
and 25
indicate that during the
1200–1800 UTC period, as the NM moves northeastward from northwestern Louisiana
to northern Alabama, the south–southeasterly flow initially over southwestern
Louisiana near LCH in its right front quadrant becomes more easterly as the low
tracks over central Mississippi near JAN and eventually northcentral Alabama
between MGM/XMR and HSV. This is quite apparent in Figs.
25c,d
as the low-level UJSC
becomes better organized in response to the deepening surface low (NM) under the
right front flank of the UJ. Simultaneously, the 700-mb flow accompanying the
propagating unbalanced jetlet’s right exit region, that is, the UJCM depicted in
Figs.
21c,d